Himachal | acid attack

Himachal: तेजाब हमले के दोषियों की सजा सस्पेंड करने से हाईकोर्ट का इन्कार

Key Facts Shimla: The Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed the application of two acid attack convicts seeking suspension of their 10-year prison sentence and release on bail. The division bench of Justice Vivek Singh…

Key Facts

Shimla: The Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed the application of two acid attack convicts seeking suspension of their 10-year prison sentence and release on bail. The division bench of Justice Vivek Singh Thakur and Justice Ranjan Sharma observed that the offense under Section 326-A of the Indian Penal Code is extremely grave, affecting a woman's physical integrity and honor. Strict standards must be applied before suspending sentence in such serious cases.

Details of the Case

The case originates from an FIR registered in 2017 at Jwali Police Station in Kangra district. The Vakf Tribunal-cum-Sessions Court Dharamshala convicted Renuka and Mohinder Singh on November 29, 2025, sentencing them to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 50,000 each under IPC Section 326-A for acid attack.

The convicts' counsel argued that there was a delay in filing the FIR and contradictions in witness statements. However, the High Court noted that once a lower court has convicted the accused, the presumption of innocence no longer exists.

Court's Reasoning

The bench emphasized that the parameters for granting bail to an undertrial and suspending the sentence of a convict are entirely different. While suspension may be the general rule for short sentences, in heinous crimes like acid attack, not suspending the sentence is the norm. The court also noted that the convicts had served only 7 to 8 months of their 10-year sentence, making early release unjustifiable given the severity of the crime. The main appeal against the conviction is still pending.

Impact and What Readers Should Know

  • The High Court's decision reinforces the stringent approach towards crimes against women, especially acid attacks.
  • It clarifies that convicts cannot expect sentence suspension merely because they have served a small portion of their term.
  • The ruling serves as a deterrent and upholds the dignity of victims.

FAQ

Why did the Himachal High Court refuse to suspend the sentence of acid attack convicts?

The court termed acid attack as a grave crime affecting a woman's physical integrity and dignity, and stated that suspension of sentence is not the norm in such heinous offenses.

What was the sentence given to the convicts?

Renuka and Mohinder Singh were sentenced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 50,000 each under IPC Section 326-A.

When was the sentence originally pronounced?

The Vakf Tribunal-cum-Sessions Court Dharamshala convicted them on November 29, 2025.

Follow us on Google News

Explore more

राम मंदिर चंदा चोरी के आरोपों पर शांता कुमार का पलटवार: ‘महाझूठ और बकवास’, विपक्ष से जांच में सहयोग की अपील

मुख्य तथ्य पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री शांता कुमार ने राम मंदिर चंदा चोरी के आरोपों को खारिज करते हुए इसे ‘महाझूठ और महाबकवास’ बताया।…

More on Himachal from Himachal Pradesh

Kangra News: DC Office Dharamshala Clears Pending Electricity Bill of Rs 3 Crore

Key Facts In a significant development, the Deputy Commissioner’s Office in Dharamshala, Kangra district, has cleared a long-pending electricity bill amounting to…

Kangra: Fall Armyworm Inspection Conducted to Protect Maize Crop

Key Facts The Agriculture Department, in collaboration with the State Biological Control Laboratory Palampur, has intensified monitoring and awareness campaigns against fall…

भारी बारिश की आशंका: कांगड़ा के 10 डिपुओं में दो माह का अग्रिम राशन भेजा गया

प्रमुख तथ्य खाद्य आपूर्ति निगम ने कांगड़ा जिले के 10 डिपुओं में दो माह का अग्रिम राशन भेज दिया है। यह कदम…